Paul McCartney Dead or Alive?
The Story of two or possibly three Paul McCartneys Part 1

Roll up for the Magical Mystery Tour! scroll away!

First: Some important background information


"To produce an organic robotoid it is necessary to have a pattern to go by. The
pattern required is that of genetic coding taken from a few cells from the body of a
human being. In this respect the Russian technique sounds like cloning, but the
technique itself is totally unrelated to genuine cloning. A robotoid is produced
within a matter of hours, and it simulates the human donor at his current age. Like
any man-made copy of anything,, but these are seldom great enough to arouse any suspicion."

ON THE MANIPULATION OF SOCIETY VIA
AR TIFICIAL/REPROGRAMMED HUMANS
Click here for pdf copy
---------------------------

The four types of ’clones’ that are used by the Illuminati click




Now on to Paul. Don't miss part two. Check link at the bottom of the page.




Bill (latter Paul) is taller with longer face


Bill

Note the curved nose. -->

Paul (left) has larger eye balls than Bill on the right. Paul 's nose is pointed and perky while Bill's
is longer, thinner and drooped. Notice Bill's lips are much more tight and thin. Bill's chin appears
to be more predominant and longer.


Notice the long face of Bill who does not have a round full face like the real Paul.
Also has owl looking features

Did Bill forgot his brown contacts



Paul had extended ears

The fact is that our nose and ears continue to grow until we die.
Notice there is NO growth at all with the photos of Bill above. What does this mean?

............



Bill was the one that was with Linda

This stare that Bill has could be what is known as the Reptilian Stare. It is a hypnotic stare.
click HERE for more info.

Paul (below) always had a blank expression. Bill on the other hand has a shaper and more intense look. Compare the photos below to the photos above.


Paul had a placid look with relaxed eyes. The imposter Paul had an outgoing look with manic eyes.


Note Paul on the left. He has a full face and large eyes.
The imoster's eyes are not as wide open and is gaunt in the face.


(above) Bill: Notice the long face, crimped mouth, thin nose curved downward. The first photo shows a thin drawn out face.
Paul had a round full boyish face. As seen above on the right, we see the very same eys and look in the imposter's face.



Real Paul: Notice the wider nose and a warmer and friendlier look. Also has boyish features with full cheeks.

Paul's nose slants slightly upward while Bill's droops down. Some say he may have had a nose job.
If so why would he make his nose so ugly?


Paul left and Bill on the right. Bill has a sharper longer chin. Paul's is flat and shorter with fuller lips.

Paul's whisker shadow slopes downwards while Bill's appears to be straight across.



Bill looks more French than English! And what ever happened to Paul's Liverpool accent? Bill talks like he has a sock in his mouth.

Note too that Paul never had this constant wide eye look that Bill has.

The one and only Billy/William Shears aka William Shakespeare. Click Here

Remember how Bill is seen with a thin curved nose, up swept right eyebrow, longer sharper chin with smaller thinner lips?

"May I introduce to you, the one and only Billy Shears! They don't like him, the fool on the hill."


Note the downward curved nose!

Three Paul McCartneys?

Paul below



Almond Eye Paul Below

Crimped Mouth Paul below

Paul's Swooped Right Eyebrow

Paul's un-Swooped Right Eyebrow


Paul on the left shows visible aging. The photo on the right was taken sometime later and shows a younger Paul with no sign of aging around the chin and eyes. Paul on the left has a round shaped head while Paul on the right has a longer and leaner face. Plastic surgery? No. Why is because Paul looks older again in other pictures taken at a later date. Again we see the nose curved downward. Note two that Paul on the right has a longer more profound chin with a slight cleft. Upper lip appears thinner too. Nose appears longer.

Come and meet Bill (William) in the bar on YouTube (below)

   

   

I have for many years been active in facial comparisons. With regards to Paul McCartney and "Bill", my conjectures are as a follows. Bill appears off and on in early pictures of the Beatles. Bill does no singing leading up to 1966. In 1967 with the release of Sgt Pepper's, suddenly Bill has taken over completely with singing and pictures of himself on and in the foldout album jacket.   Billy Shears is now introduced the world for the first time. For the first time Paul's voice has changed. It is a higher scale and the natural lower tones of Paul are gone for good.

Bill sings with a flat falsetto type voice.   Paul was in the movie Hard Days Night and Help, but then it is just Bill who is seen in Magical Mystery Tour. His accent has changed as well as his body movements. The songs are all sung by Bill.  

   

Compare Taste of Honey to Fool on the Hill.
There is a obvious difference in range and pitch. 

   


Paul sings Fool on the Hill. (left) Bill sings same song, (right). For those with a musical ear will hear a big difference in the singing. Bill has a smooth flat falsetto which is higher in tone. Paul is lower in tone with a bottom end to it. Not near as smooth as Bill. Number 1 video picture is Paul and not Bill. Paul always struggled with the higher notes while Bill does it with ease. Listen to Bill sing Fool on the Hill and try to imagine him singing Taste of Honey. Not a chance. Bill cannot hit the low notes while Paul cannot hit the high notes very well.


Notice in the last verse when Paul sings "...all my lovin to you" that he really strains with the higher range.
Bill would not have a problem with this higher range even thought the human voice deepens with age.

Above: The difference in singing is very obvious! Paul's singing is rough and a bit whining, yet Bill's is higher, flatter, and smoother. Plus they look different.

Paul has a boyish round face while Bill has a longer drawn face. Bill is much better looking. People say how can you have such a close match with the voices. Well I have heard some Elvis impersonators that I could barely tell the difference in singing from the real Elvis.

Paul's speaking voice

 

Paul's voice (left) is low in tone. Bill on the right has a higher flute like tones. His voice tends to toot. Listen to the tones when he says "happy litle songwriters." Note too that Paul's hand movements are totally different than Bill's. Paul tends to keep his hand close to his mouth most of the time.

 
In the early days of recording, when did Paul ever sing like this?

See very important video

http://thewingedbeatle.com/Home.html


What does Heather Mills know?

See the Beatles Occult connections


Evil Beatles?
 

See Part Two

More information at:

Stargods
Home Page